Rate of response - PDFSEARCH.IO - Document Search Engine

Rate of response
Results: 1431

#	Item
491	Methodology Marquette Law School Poll, August 2-5, 2012 The Marquette Law School Poll was conducted August 2-5, 2012. A total of 1,400 Wisconsin registered voters and eligible voters who said they would register by Elect Add to Reading List Source URL: law.marquette.edu Language: English - Date: 2012-08-08 10:18:32 Margin of error Sample size determination Stratified sampling Statistics Sampling Response rate
492	Methodology Marquette Law School Poll, April 2012 The Marquette Law School Poll was conducted April 26-29, 2012. A total of 705 Wisconsin registered voters and eligible voters who said they would register by Election Day Add to Reading List Source URL: law.marquette.edu Language: English - Date: 2012-05-02 12:36:05 Margin of error Sample size determination Statistics Sampling Response rate
493	Methodology Marquette Law School Poll, September 27-30, 2012 The Marquette Law School Poll was conducted September 27-30, 2012. A total of 1,003 Wisconsin registered voters and eligible voters who said they would registe Add to Reading List Source URL: law.marquette.edu Language: English - Date: 2012-10-03 10:04:26 Sampling Response rate Sample size determination
494	Methodology Marquette Law School Poll, May 2013 The Marquette Law School Poll was conducted May 6-9, 2013. A total of 717 Wisconsin registered voters were interviewed by a combination of landline and cell phone using ran Add to Reading List Source URL: law.marquette.edu Language: English - Date: 2013-05-14 10:27:15 Margin of error Sample size determination Statistics Sampling Response rate
495	Methodology Marquette Law School Poll, September 13-16, 2012 The Marquette Law School Poll was conducted September 13-16, 2012. A total of 705 Wisconsin registered voters and eligible voters who said they would register Add to Reading List Source URL: law.marquette.edu Language: English - Date: 2012-09-19 10:33:03 Sampling Response rate Sample size determination
496	United States Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Add to Reading List Source URL: nass.usda.gov Language: English - Date: 2011-02-08 14:55:28 Data collection Psychometrics Evaluation methods Response rate National Agricultural Statistics Service Survey data collection Census Non-response bias Response bias Statistics Sampling Survey methodology
497	Methodology Marquette Law School Poll, October 25-28, 2012 The Marquette Law School Poll was conducted October 25-28, 2012. A total of 1,404 Wisconsin registered voters and eligible voters who said they would register by Add to Reading List Source URL: law.marquette.edu Language: English - Date: 2012-10-31 12:09:22 Sample size determination Margin of error Statistics Sampling Response rate
498	Methodology Marquette Law School Poll, August 16-19, 2012 The Marquette Law School Poll was conducted August 16-19, 2012. A total of 706 Wisconsin registered voters and eligible voters who said they would register by Ele Add to Reading List Source URL: law.marquette.edu Language: English - Date: 2012-08-22 10:50:27 Sample size determination Margin of error Statistics Sampling Response rate
499	Methodology Marquette Law School Poll, March 2012 The Marquette Law School Poll was conducted March 22-25, 2012. A total of 707 Wisconsin registered voters and eligible voters who said they would register by Election Day Add to Reading List Source URL: law.marquette.edu Language: English - Date: 2012-03-27 13:31:52 Response rate Sample size determination Stratified sampling Errors and residuals in statistics Statistics Sampling Margin of error
500	“No” Is the Easiest Answer: Using Calibration to Assess Nonignorable Nonresponse in the 2002 Census of Agriculture Phillip S. Kott )))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) Add to Reading List Source URL: nass.usda.gov Language: English - Date: 2011-02-08 14:55:37 Sampling Calibration Instrumental variable Variable Variance National Agricultural Statistics Service Response rate Statistics Regression analysis Survey methodology

UPDATE